& other; Sino-us trade negotiation is the most uncontrollable part trump the President himself. Throughout the &; On March 24, at Harvard University’s Kennedy school of government, a senior research fellow at the former Australian prime minister Kevin Rudd (Kevin Rudd) under the state council development research center, sponsored by the China development top BBS, said economic summit in 2018.
trade between China and the United States continues. On March 24, China resources group co., LTD., chairman of Fu Yuning development top BBS 2018 economic summit in China & other; & lsquo; One Belt And One Road & rsquo; Aid human destiny community & throughout; Group meeting with Harvard University’s Kennedy school of government, a senior research fellow at the former Australian prime minister Kevin Rudd (Kevin Rudd) will start under the background of trade disputes in the United States, by China & other; One Belt And One Road & throughout; Initiative for the construction of human destiny community play a positive role, launched a deep conversation.
dialogue between, rudd said, & other; Article 301 & throughout; Impact on China will be more big, but not dramatically, because from the list of trump sanctions list and China’s countermeasures list, you can see that the two list does not involve the core interests of bilateral economic and trade relations. After that the two sides also looking for the solution of the problem, the U.S. request, to further reduce surplus, China and the United States had $100 billion in the us deficit reduction, in 2019 and 2020, added up to 200 billion dollars. We want to have patience, still need some time to wait for the result of the real, in fact in the management of trade relations between the two sides have at & other; Half a deal & throughout; The relationship between.
in Mr Rudd’s view, the most uncontrollable part of sino-us trade negotiations, is the President himself trump.
Chinese former Australian prime minister Kevin rudd vision information figure
the following is the full text dialogue:
Fu Yuning : on March 23, President of the United States trump officially signed a memorandum of trade with China in the White House. Trump announced that it will likely impose tariffs on China imported $60 billion of goods, and limit the Chinese companies to invest in the mergers and acquisitions. To this, what do you think?
Kevin rudd: compared with the increase of this month, the President signed trump tariff bill, & other; Article 301 & throughout; Impact on China will be bigger, but frankly are not sharp. Sanctions against bit trump list list and China’s countermeasures list, you can see that the two list does not involve the core interests of bilateral economic and trade relations. I think of it as a signal. After the appearance, the two sides also looking for the solution of the problem. The U.S. request, to further reduce surplus, China and the United States had $100 billion in the us deficit reduction, in 2019 and 2020, added up to $200 billion. Be patient, the real results still need some time to wait, actually in the management of trade relations between the two sides have at & other; Half a deal & throughout; The relationship between.
the most uncontrollable part of sino-us trade negotiations, in my opinion, seems to be a trump the President himself. We don’t know if he will remember their today said in the past, yesterday or tomorrow he said today will be forgotten.
to be sure, we all don’t want to see some trade disputes evolved into a full and complete trade war. I’m more worried about is, the President of the United States can be so easily to tariffs as a weapon, and easily in a speech to the lexicon, this approach too rash. America blindly ignored the WTO make a ruling on sino-us trade dispute, a move that has clearly against the spirit of gatt.
Fu Yuning : China is now Australia’s biggest trading partner, Macao trade reached $137 billion, 2017 years between the china-australia relationship changes are also a lot of people waiting to see. In your opinion, how will you ensure that china-australia maintain a peace between prosperity and stability for the future?
Kevin rudd : first of all, I feel very lucky, she has already not the prime minister of Australia. I have settled in the United States four years, and as a senior researcher at Harvard University, as well as other policy research group in the United States. Now of I, is a global citizen, so I don’t need to be responsible for what I have said anything.
involves the australia-china relations, I admit, for a period of time in the past, has some ups and downs in bilateral political exchanges.
but the fundamentals of economic relations between the two countries in general is good, so far, I haven’t seen in people-to-people and cultural exchanges between the two countries, economic and other aspects have a bigger impact.
station in Australia’s point of view, in the past decades, including me during the period of the prime minister, we have always been taking & other; Two legs & throughout; Way to walk, or we are & other; Walk and chew gum & throughout; . Australia and the United States as an ally, walk together, at the same time, it has always maintained good relations with China.
some people think that, as in Australia, now have to make a political or strategic decision and choice, is to choose the United States or China. I don’t think all the time, Australia needs to make such a decision. I personally for Australia suggestion is that, in dealing with China in the future, need to be prudent, how should each other specific strategic direction to make comments.
Fu Yuning : China & other; One Belt And One Road & throughout; The starting point of initiative is very good. In your opinion, in the future & other; One Belt And One Road & throughout; Initiative in the process of advancing, the biggest obstacle will come from?
Kevin rudd : I for & other; One Belt And One Road & throughout; Initiative to build a community of human destiny’s contribution is highly appreciated. For a long time, China & other; One Belt And One Road & throughout; Initiative is very frank, in Eurasia now no country is willing to offer money to construction under the background of the region’s infrastructure, China is willing to stand up to do this, this is very rare.
for & other; One Belt And One Road & throughout; Will likely to encounter problems, I think that China is fully capable of & other; Go one step at a time throughout the &; & other; Touch stone across the river & throughout; , will be reflected in this way & other; One Belt And One Road & throughout; In the construction of the future. Will be in the international society in the future three criteria to evaluate & other; One Belt And One Road & throughout; Success: one is the environmental protection standard, especially in the electricity sector; Second, the local labor standards, including wages, labor, environment, etc.; Three is whether the project contracts signed transparent.
& other; One Belt And One Road & throughout; Is a very good initiative, in the future in the process, may have a wider impact on Eurasia. The future China can put forward & other; One Belt And One Road & throughout; To carry out the behavior guide, as worldwide in the field of project to do. In fact, the investment bank has successfully done some work in this field, such as in the process of project implementation following high standard request.
frankly, in the western countries, & other; One Belt And One Road & throughout; Sometimes regarded as China’s geopolitical expansion plans. To eliminate these doubts, I suggest that, in the future China project in the tender, and so on various aspects of employment must be transparent, to the project as a truly global project to run, or this would be the biggest challenge.
(this article by surging news according to the field of shorthand and recording, without the speaker revised it)